Sam Harris on Obama's religious tightrope walk

Sam Harris is another of the intelligent, articulate observers of the current upheaval in the "spirituality" movement. Remember when spirituality was the "megatrend" that would blossom fully by 2010? Ain't going to happen. Of course, full-blown atheism isn't going to happen by then either, because the issue is so widely disruptive.

Since John Edwards quit the race, I've been an enthusiastic Obama supporter. Harris commends Obama's recent speech on religion but shows why it was so circumspect in many ways. A good read.

Here's an excerpt:

Like every candidate, Obama must appeal to millions of voters who believe that without religion, most of us would spend our days raping and killing our neighbors and stealing their pornography. Examples of well-behaved and comparatively atheistic societies like Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Denmark--which surpass us in terrestrial virtues like education, health, public generosity, per capita aid to the developing world, and low rates of violent crime and infant mortality--are of no interest to our electorate whatsoever. It is, of course, good to know that people like Reverend Wright occasionally do help the poor, feed the hungry, and care for the sick. But wouldn't it be better to do these things for reasons that are not manifestly delusional? Can we care for one another without believing that Jesus Christ rose from the dead and is now listening to our thoughts?

What Barack Obama Could Not (and Should Not) Say